Posted by Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Arms
The fresh Tickencote picture seems to go out off no less than 1650 in respect in order to web page 3of Certain Ideas of your own Wingfield Family because of the Wingfield, John Meters.London: Murray, 1925 republished because of the Wingfield Members of the family Area into the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-nine.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld off Letheringham, their [Sir Robert who d. ily regarding six or eight sons and you will fivedaughters, and is also out-of him, together with his pupils and you may grandkids,which played zero small part regarding facts of your world off England, you to thepresent work [Wingfield’s publication] treats.
Their eldest son was Sir John Wyngfeld out-of Letheringham, Knight, which, that have hiswife, mode the 2 central rates from the dated pedigree petroleum sketches whichprovide the topic of these details.
There have been two ones oictures around, almost identically the same, oneat Tickencote Hall, Rutland, as well as the almost every other from the Boughton House, Northants. Itis unknown which is the brand spanking new and you can the copy.
Which couple is encircled regarding ideal and base data because of the all their 16 college students, within the for each and every situation Wingfield home (1) Bosville and (2) every quarter, Goushell therefore the chequy coating
The one at Tickncote, today belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, is decorated to the material, and also probably been there due to the fact about1650, as it is most likely so it ended up being the house of your own past SirRobert Wingfield off Upton, in the Northamptonshire, who is considered possess diedduring the newest commonwealth, and lots of from whose petroleum drawings was actually within thattime removed so you’re able to their cousin’s home at the Tickencote, when Upton try ended up selling, andwhich will always be here.”
Mcdougal says you to “the picture in the Boughton family could easily be tracedback to 1677” (web page cuatro) and offer a filipino dating apps few statements about middle 1700srefering to way of the image and its own demonstration into Duke ofMontague.
The writer says into the page 6 you to “When, or by the whose order, or because of the which they waspainted, has been a concern undecided because of the advantages.”
Once again, my issues on the group cardiovascular system maybe not around the genealogicalconnections out of the players, (this new Wingfields was indeed researched fairlywell, and you can despite my personal typo to the Howard household members, I actually do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated in RI) however, for the reason at which safeguards weredisplayed by second one or two generations. In my opinion We have a sense of just what”should” be on the brand new particular protects, and you will are questioning why, in cases like this,that does not be seemingly what is actually shown. Possibly I’m mistaken into the myunderstanding, and/or Wingfield’s have been to try out very quick and you will sagging withtheir hands for many mission and therefore we may not even know.
Kelly, thanks for delivering me images, and you will due to Tim getting protecting me the challenge away from getting them online. Looking so it over and the pedigrees in Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of Old Saxon Family of Wingfield_, the company is obvious for me; additionally, it appears that there is one glaring heraldic mistake, in the guts, possibly the supply of your own confusion. I’m able to know We have not twice-searched every kids’ impalings and that i have one other unanswered concern (what is the coroneted lozenge throughout the down sign in?). The yellow lines seem to superimposed on this subject visualize from the guide commonly such as for instance of good use, in addition to annotated ‘key’ cannot actually duplicate the text captions and you can will not identify individuals whoever hands are shown.
There are two interesting what to the image suggesting a few various other concentrates. Very first, it centers around a fifteenth-century wedding and you will suggests the children of this matrimony, but no after matter. Second, they reveals an equity department that have descent right down to the seventeenth century.
Brand new main panel ‘s the wedding regarding Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) so you can Elizabeth, dau. from Sir John Fitz Lewis and you can Anne (Montacute). Both rates kneel in the middle, and are also surmounted by the impalings of the parents’ possession in the wreaths. The fresh heraldic mistake is here, due to the fact Sir John’s father’s completion each other quarters and impales Gousell (actually, Gousell quartered with this specific chequy finish). It is a mistake. It’s visible your quartering out-of Gousell plus the chequy coating is available in at that time, that it can not be each other quartered and you may impaled regarding wreath (except if, from the implication, Sir John just who d. 1481 got removed a keen Oedipus and partnered his personal mommy). Some thing I really don’t accept is the coroneted lozenge hanging above the youngsters on straight down check in.