Posted by The latest petitioner values this new attention centered on that the European union was authored and you may anxieties that most residents features each other legal rights and loans. Within his thoughts, the latest Eu should shield its owners a great modicum regarding self-respect, provide for their very first demands in terms of as well as security and help municipalities that assist the latest desperate. The fresh petitioner himself is suffering from an air impairment and you can, having given a writeup on his earnings and you can expense, asks the new European Parliament for taking the necessary steps to change most recent standards from the reaching out directly to customers in need.
The new petitioner states you to good Italian language Social Security Agencies inside the Stuttgart refused to render him having a digital wheelchair despite their disability and require for one. He asserts your medical comparison presented on the government is actually useless and little to no said got to their crash report and medical cards out-of Spain, where he previously lived for over three decades up to 2014. The Personal Defense Company generated specifications getting a manual wheelchair but the fresh petitioner claims this really is inadequate and also for it cause the guy is entirely determined by personal household members.
Petition No by Iwona Nowak (Polish) to your a supposedly unlawful court decision regarding profit off something towards the Shine market
The latest petitioner complains one to she is wrongfully sentenced by a legal to possess putting on the newest Gloss sector a health merchandise that is presumably greet having business regarding Eu. She claims one to by mistake she signed a beneficial testimony including incorrect claims. Alleged certificates and you may documents regarding the product was declined of the legal as the untrue. The brand new petitioner argues you to industry competitors got interest in slandering their and now have Savannah, MO female use the information about their handicap up against their particular. She claims the unlawful court choice discriminates the maker off the product on the Shine market.
Petition by the D.B. (British), with the To a private lifestyle
The petitioner try discussing his or her own problem, specifically his endeavor on account of impairment and you will disease, seeking to challenge each day. In cases like this they are getting assisted because of the a couple of individuals whom, it appears to be, do not have legal quarters in the uk. He is afraid to fairly share it as they are scared the bodies usually takes all of them off him. He wishes them to be given the position regarding regular migrants simply because they let him more the brand new personal functions in his country actually would. The guy will not reveal the latest nationality or nation from origin out of both some one.
Petition Zero because of the Heinz Karl Bauch (German), towards the cessation out of his your retirement off The country of spain
The latest petitioner is actually a great Italian language resident. He worked when you look at the Spain for five years, 7 months and two days and had necessary health and retirement insurance rates. The guy acquired your retirement repayments in the The country of spain. Within the the guy relocated to Germany with his several small sons. During the Germany, he was offered this new custody from his two sons and you will acquired a certification away from handicap. As of he is no more choosing their Language pension. The latest petitioner states that he has never acquired a particular cause of the reasons to have terminating the retirement payments and he secret perhaps the cessation try legitimate.
Petition by the Silviu Timoftei (Romanian) into amendments in order to Romanian legislation to the classification of people with disabilities
This new petitioner explains one to Romanian statutes used when you look at the 2007 revised the brand new conditions having classifying levels of disability placed down into the 2002, reinstating new criteria that were invest 1992. The petitioner takes the view you to Romania adjusted its laws and regulations to your people with disabilities simply for the purpose of fulfilling the brand new requirements getting joining europe, after the it returned to the fresh new ””anti-European”” laws written following the overthrow of one’s communist techniques. The new petitioner was askin the latest Western european Parliament so that Eu guidelines is known in addition to liberties of men and women that have handicaps was safe.